“A Processor” Can Mean More Than One Processor, But At Least One of Multiple Processors Has to be Capable of Performing All of “Said” Processor’s Functions

In Salazar v. AT&T Mobility LLC, [2021-2320, 2021-2376] (April 5, 2023), the Federal Circuit affirmed judgment of noninfringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,802,467 describing technology for wireless and wired communications. Claim 1 of the ‘467 patent required “a microprocessor for … Continue reading “A Processor” Can Mean More Than One Processor, But At Least One of Multiple Processors Has to be Capable of Performing All of “Said” Processor’s Functions